D-VLC: Decentralized Vision-Language Collaboration for Heterogeneous Embodied Multi-Robot Systems in Unknown Environments
arXiv:2607.29009v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-robot systems, particularly heterogeneous robot swarms, can improve the efficiency of complex task execution through parallel collaboration and complementary capabilities. However, conventional rule-based methods rely on predefined task models and specialized decision making programs, making it difficult to understand complex semantic instructions and coordinate heterogeneous robots. LLMs introduce strong language understanding and task reas
Overview
arXiv:2607.29009v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-robot systems, particularly heterogeneous robot swarms, can improve the efficiency of complex task execution through parallel collaboration and complementary capabilities. However, conventional rule-based methods rely on predefined task models and specialized decision making programs, making it difficult to understand complex semantic instructions and coordinate heterogeneous robots. LLMs introduce strong language understanding and task reasoning capabilities, allowing multi-robot systems to interpret instructions, decompose tasks, and assign roles according to task semantics. VLMs further incorporate visual perception, enabling robots to reason about objects, regions, and spatial relationships in physical environments. Nevertheless, existing LLM/VLM based methods often depend on known maps, centralized and synchronized decision making, limiting their generalization to heterogeneous robots and unseen tasks. We therefore propose a framework that combines decentralized asynchronous reasoning, lightweight information sharing, capability aware collaboration, and a unified action interface, enabling general purpose VLMs to generate robot specific actions executed by learning free experts without task or robot specific training. Experiments across diverse scenarios and multiple VLMs show success rates above 70\%, with completion time reduced by up to 55.8\% relative to the geometric greedy baseline.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29009