Goal Staying Makes Sum-of-Costs Anonymous Multi-Agent Path Finding NP-Hard
arXiv:2608.28658v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Anonymous Multi-Agent Path Finding (AMAPF) admits polynomial-time network-flow algorithms for several objectives, including makespan, total distance, and sum-of-costs (SoC) when agents disappear upon reaching goals. We show that standard goal-staying AMAPF is fundamentally different. We first formulate SoC minimization by augmenting the standard time-expanded flow model with goal-settlement constraints and show that the resulting linear programm
Overview
arXiv:2608.28658v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Anonymous Multi-Agent Path Finding (AMAPF) admits polynomial-time network-flow algorithms for several objectives, including makespan, total distance, and sum-of-costs (SoC) when agents disappear upon reaching goals. We show that standard goal-staying AMAPF is fundamentally different. We first formulate SoC minimization by augmenting the standard time-expanded flow model with goal-settlement constraints and show that the resulting linear programming relaxation is non-integral. We then prove that minimizing SoC in goal-staying AMAPF is NP-hard via a reduction from 3-SAT. Together with the polynomial-time result for the disappearing variant, this establishes a sharp complexity boundary determined by whether completed agents remain at their goals.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28658
