Identifying Habit, Physics, and Nuisance in Robot World Models
arXiv:2609.09210v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Teleoperated demonstrations are often multimodal even when the underlying dynamics are nearly deterministic given the executed action. We argue that this multimodality typically mixes three factors--operator habit in action selection, shared physics, and observation nuisance--and that entangled next-observation predictors absorb all three. We formalize the split with a structural causal model a=g(h,z,u), z'=f(z,a), o=r(z,c), and test it with compl
Overview
arXiv:2609.09210v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Teleoperated demonstrations are often multimodal even when the underlying dynamics are nearly deterministic given the executed action. We argue that this multimodality typically mixes three factors--operator habit in action selection, shared physics, and observation nuisance--and that entangled next-observation predictors absorb all three. We formalize the split with a structural causal model a=g(h,z,u), z'=f(z,a), o=r(z,c), and test it with complementary interventions: replacing or shuffling actions at fixed state sharply increases next-state error, whereas appearance and camera changes should not; habit-aware reverse scoring improves ranking of feasible pasts without rewriting the dynamics. The associated adaptation rule is to freeze a shared physics readout and update only a thin interface. On StackCube, DROID, and RH20T this rule improves low-shot transfer relative to training from scratch, retains cleaner dynamics under corrupted adaptation data, and extends from proprioception to pixel observations with multi-view and multi-step checks. We do not equate latent actions with operator habit, and we do not target large-scale video generation benchmarks.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09210
