Industry Monitor Humanoid Industrial & Cobot AGV / AMR Quadruped Reducers · Servos · Sensors Drones & Autonomy Embodied AI
Robos News
Robotics

IMAC-AgriVLN: Can Agricultural Vision-and-Language Navigation Agents be Aware of Instruction Mistakes?

arXiv:2606.02519v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agricultural robots are playing as important roles across a wide range of tasks, nevertheless, they are still mainly depending on manual operations or fixed railways for moving. The A2A benchmark and the AgriVLN method pioneeringly extended Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) to the agricultural domain, successfully navigating agricultural robots from starting points to target positions following natural language instructions. However, we obs

Published August 26, 2026 · Category: Robotics

Overview

arXiv:2606.02519v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agricultural robots are playing as important roles across a wide range of tasks, nevertheless, they are still mainly depending on manual operations or fixed railways for moving. The A2A benchmark and the AgriVLN method pioneeringly extended Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) to the agricultural domain, successfully navigating agricultural robots from starting points to target positions following natural language instructions. However, we observed that almost all the prior VLN methods adopted an ideal assumption: The given instructions themselves were correct. This assumption did not align with the realistic scenarios, because anybody might say an instruction with mistakes, which raised us a question: If an instruction had a mistake, could an agricultural VLN agent be aware of it? To answer this question, we propose the A2A-MI benchmark, in which we follow A2A as the foundation benchmark and insert three classes of instruction mistakes. We use it to evaluate several state-of-the-art agricultural VLN agents, then observe sufficient drops across all of them, such as AgriVLN decreases SR by 57% in average and increases NE by 9% in average, from which we suggest the lacking awareness on instruction mistakes. To address this problem, we propose the IMAC module analyzing the instruction and image, to reason whether the instruction has mistakes and attempt to correct them when needed. We integrate it into the AgriVLN backbone to build our IMAC-AgriVLN method, successfully saving SR from 0.10 to 0.14 and NE from 4.81 m to 4.79 m, which demonstrates the effectiveness of IMAC on strengthening the robustness against instruction mistakes. Project: https://github.com/AlexTraveling/IMAC-AgriVLN.

Source

Originally published at arxiv.org.

Related Articles

Robos News Newsroom

Robos News reports on robotics research, components, manufacturers, field deployments, and industrial automation worldwide. Tip our newsroom: [email protected]

Email the newsroom →
Reporting standard: Product specifications, deployment counts, and performance claims are attributed to their source. Safety-critical decisions should be based on the applicable technical documentation and validation for the operating environment.
More from Industry →