Kepler-Encoder-v0.1: Towards a Multimodal Embedding Model for Robots
arXiv:2607.13522v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A robot must understand the state of its own body, but a camera sees only part of it. Force and contact leave almost no trace in a single frame, and raw vision features read force at $R^2$ at or below $0.10$ on every robot we test. We present Kepler-Encoder-v0.1, a robot-first multimodal encoder that treats robot state as a modality and fuses vision, proprioception, and force/torque into a single shared latent with a learned-query cross-attention
Overview
arXiv:2607.13522v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A robot must understand the state of its own body, but a camera sees only part of it. Force and contact leave almost no trace in a single frame, and raw vision features read force at $R^2$ at or below $0.10$ on every robot we test. We present Kepler-Encoder-v0.1, a robot-first multimodal encoder that treats robot state as a modality and fuses vision, proprioception, and force/torque into a single shared latent with a learned-query cross-attention layer, trained self-supervised by masked cross-modal prediction under the LeJEPA/SIGReg objective. At evaluation only vision enters, which poses a sharp question. Does fusing state into training make the vision-only latent carry anything the pixels do not already contain? On the RH20T corpus the answer is yes, precisely where the camera is weakest. On held-out scenes, the vision-only latent recovers end-effector state, and force in particular, significantly above both raw frozen-ViT features and a compute-matched vision-only control on every sensored robot, though absolute force recovery at a single timestep is modest; on motor state, which the camera largely sees, it is statistically tied with the strongest vision baselines, and it is the only feature whose latent geometry tracks state. A single embodiment-agnostic encoder covers four robots, and a data-matched control shows this breadth reflects embodiment diversity rather than data volume. The frozen latent is directly useful. Its own cross-modal prediction error is a training-free invalid-state monitor (AUROC $0.90$ on out-of-range states, $0.69$ on scene-swapped states), and a diffusion decoder (PixNerd) reconstructs the camera frame from the latent, confirming the spatial compression preserves world-state. This report validates the single-timestep case; native-rate temporal fusion is the next step.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13522