Learning Physical Interaction: A Survey of Tactile- and Force-aware Robot Learning
arXiv:2608.07558v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physically grounded robot intelligence requires robots to perceive, reason about, and regulate their interactions with the physical world. This capability is particularly critical in contact-sensitive manipulation, where successful task execution depends not only on visual perception and motion generation, but also on force regulation and adaptive control. In this context, recent robot learning methods have made substantial progress by integrating
Overview
arXiv:2608.07558v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physically grounded robot intelligence requires robots to perceive, reason about, and regulate their interactions with the physical world. This capability is particularly critical in contact-sensitive manipulation, where successful task execution depends not only on visual perception and motion generation, but also on force regulation and adaptive control. In this context, recent robot learning methods have made substantial progress by integrating force, tactile, vision, language, and proprioceptive sensing into learned manipulation policies. In parallel, many systems adopt multi-phase architectures that combine high-level policies, action-refinement modules, and low-level controllers to bridge semantic task understanding with reactive physical execution. Despite these advances, existing surveys have not explicitly reviewed force- and tactile-aware robot learning from a unified perspective that jointly captures multimodal sensing and multi-phase system design. This survey addresses this gap by proposing TF-ART, a Tactile/Force-Aware Robot learning Taxonomy for multimodal and multi-phase frameworks, which maps individual methods into a unified hierarchical structure. The framework characterizes how recent works organize observation modalities, encode and fuse heterogeneous sensory inputs, generate and refine actions across multiple phases, and connect learned policies to reactive robot-end control. Building on this methodological view, we further examine the task settings and infrastructure requirements of physical interaction, thereby integrating both algorithmic and practical perspectives on force- and tactile-aware robot learning.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
- PhysX-CoT: Structured Physical Reasoning from a Single Image to Simulation-Ready 3D Assets
- Anchor-Based AI Approach for Pre-Crash Object Detection Utilizing Micro-Doppler Signatures in Automotive Radar
- Removing Infrastructure Barriers in Human-Robot Collaboration Through Wireless Reconfigurable Cells
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07558
