Navigate or Relocate? Planning Among Movable Obstacles in Unknown Environments
arXiv:2609.19541v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Conventional robot planning methods seek collision-free paths to a goal but fail when all paths are blocked. In these cases, the robot must determine which objects to relocate, in what order, and where to place them to clear a path---a problem known as Navigation Among Movable Obstacles (NAMO). Most NAMO planners assume a known environment, while existing approaches for unknown environments typically reason locally about relocations and cannot pla
Overview
arXiv:2609.19541v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Conventional robot planning methods seek collision-free paths to a goal but fail when all paths are blocked. In these cases, the robot must determine which objects to relocate, in what order, and where to place them to clear a path---a problem known as Navigation Among Movable Obstacles (NAMO). Most NAMO planners assume a known environment, while existing approaches for unknown environments typically reason locally about relocations and cannot plan interdependent relocation sequences. We consider NAMO in unknown environments revealed through onboard sensing, where the robot must decide whether a blocked route requires relocation or a feasible path may exist through unexplored space. We propose an online framework that addresses this ambiguity by selecting between navigation and relocation using shortest paths that treat discovered movable objects as obstacles or as removable. Navigation relies on existing motion planners, while relocation uses a sampling-based approach that, unlike existing approaches for unknown environments, searches over \textit{interdependent} relocation sequences and uses an LLM to bias sampling. Numerical experiments demonstrate scalability to cluttered environments requiring interdependent relocations and improved plan quality over existing baselines.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19541
