Safe Multi-Robot Coordination via VLM-LLM Reasoning and Reachability Analysis
arXiv:2609.27816v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safe coordination in heterogeneous machine-to-machine (M2M) robotic systems is challenging when robots differ in sensing capabilities, environmental awareness, and motion execution roles. This paper presents a centralized safety-aware M2M framework for cooperative goal-directed navigation in a heterogeneous mobile robot team comprising a vision-capable quadruped and a camera-less robotic vehicle. The objective is to guide both platforms toward a g
Overview
arXiv:2609.27816v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safe coordination in heterogeneous machine-to-machine (M2M) robotic systems is challenging when robots differ in sensing capabilities, environmental awareness, and motion execution roles. This paper presents a centralized safety-aware M2M framework for cooperative goal-directed navigation in a heterogeneous mobile robot team comprising a vision-capable quadruped and a camera-less robotic vehicle. The objective is to guide both platforms toward a goal region while avoiding static and dynamic obstacles and preventing unsafe inter-robot interactions. Under the principle of shared perception, the vision-capable robot provides semantic environmental awareness through a centralized server over an MQTT broker, enabling the camera-less platform to navigate using this shared scene representation alongside its own odometry, IMU, and state feedback. A vision-language model (VLM) interprets the visual stream, and the extracted semantic data is mapped into conservative metric geometric constraints, including inflated obstacle sets, safe corridors, and goal regions. A large language model (LLM) proposes high-level task allocations, while physical command authority is restricted to a robot-specific zonotope reachability gate. This verification engine propagates independent reachable tubes to evaluate obstacle avoidance, safe-corridor containment, and inter-robot separation predicates before approving commands. Online experiments across clear-path and dynamic-obstacle scenarios show that the pipeline reliably approves safe motion, triggers conservative replanning or holding maneuvers upon constraint violation, and enforces a strict architectural separation between advisory semantic reasoning and formally verified motor execution.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27816