Semantic Map Sharing and Capability-Aware Coverage Planning for AI-Native 6G Robotic Coordination
arXiv:2609.37666v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search and Rescue (SAR) operations increasingly deploy heterogeneous teams of aerial and ground robots. However, conventional coverage methods typically do not translate perceived terrain into platform-specific reachability, while continuous image exchange imposes a high communication cost. We propose an edge-centric, semantic-aware coverage planning framework that integrates aerial terrain perception, robot-specific traversability reasoning, and
Overview
arXiv:2609.37666v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search and Rescue (SAR) operations increasingly deploy heterogeneous teams of aerial and ground robots. However, conventional coverage methods typically do not translate perceived terrain into platform-specific reachability, while continuous image exchange imposes a high communication cost. We propose an edge-centric, semantic-aware coverage planning framework that integrates aerial terrain perception, robot-specific traversability reasoning, and payload-efficient semantic state sharing. Aerial observations are converted into compact semantic grid maps, enabling reachability-constrained area decomposition and capability-aware coverage paths that assign only regions admitted by each robot's capability profile. The resulting perception-sharing-planning loop feeds semantic corrections into traversability reasoning and replanning, forming an application-level mechanism motivated by AI-enabled goal-oriented communication envisioned for AI-native 6G networks. For the high-update case, transmitting semantic corrections reduces the application payload by a factor of approximately $82$ relative to periodic full-map sharing. Across matched benchmark scenarios, the proposed method achieved $91.5\%$ coverage with no capability-infeasible allocations, compared with $78.8\%$ coverage and a $21.5\%$ capability-infeasible allocation rate for LS-MCPP. Semantic corrections update the shared planning state without requiring repeated transmission of the complete map.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37666
