TADreamer: Zero-Shot Language-Guided 3D Navigation for Terrestrial-Aerial Bimodal Robots via Video Imagination
arXiv:2609.19824v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language-guided navigation for terrestrial-aerial bimodal robots requires selecting routes and locomotion modes that match scene context and task intent. Generated videos can represent such motion sequences, but recovering metrically consistent navigation references from them is challenging because of scale ambiguity and axis-dependent geometric distortions. We present TADreamer, a zero-shot framework that grounds video-imagined navigation in meas
Overview
arXiv:2609.19824v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language-guided navigation for terrestrial-aerial bimodal robots requires selecting routes and locomotion modes that match scene context and task intent. Generated videos can represent such motion sequences, but recovering metrically consistent navigation references from them is challenging because of scale ambiguity and axis-dependent geometric distortions. We present TADreamer, a zero-shot framework that grounds video-imagined navigation in measured geometry without task-specific training or fine-tuning. A vision-language model translates onboard observations and instructions into navigation prompts, selects valid generated videos, and provides corrective feedback when regeneration is needed. The selected video is reconstructed into 3D waypoints annotated with terrestrial or aerial modes. A two-stage calibration procedure uses field-of-view constraints to initialize scale estimation, then refines axis-dependent scales, rotation, and translation by registering the reconstructed point cloud to measured geometry. The calibrated waypoints and mode labels guide a planner that incorporates measured geometry for robot execution. Real-world experiments demonstrate navigation across seven indoor and outdoor scenarios. With five candidates per round, usable videos are obtained within two rounds in all seven scenarios. On the calibration observations, our method reduces mean absolute depth error by 87.7% and mean absolute relative depth error by 86.3% compared with NavDreamer.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19824
