Try Once, Then Optimal: De-Redundified Procedure Memory for Cross-Episode Exploration Amortization
arXiv:2607.23702v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Manipulating objects with hidden internal state, such as a latched microwave, forces a robot to probe before it can act. Yet a robot that has solved an instance once re-runs the same probes whenever it encounters that instance again, because existing cross-episode memories target task success and organize reuse around states, not the object or the cost of re-exploring it. We present Instance-Oriented Memory (IOM), an object-centric framework that
Overview
arXiv:2607.23702v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Manipulating objects with hidden internal state, such as a latched microwave, forces a robot to probe before it can act. Yet a robot that has solved an instance once re-runs the same probes whenever it encounters that instance again, because existing cross-episode memories target task success and organize reuse around states, not the object or the cost of re-exploring it. We present Instance-Oriented Memory (IOM), an object-centric framework that amortizes this exploration: from a single encounter that uncovers the hidden state, whether or not it succeeds, IOM records a short procedure for manipulating that instance, keys it on the object's identifiable features, and injects it as a soft bias on a procedure-conditioned policy. A later encounter recognizes the object and recalls its procedure instead of re-exploring. We instantiate this distillation with an off-the-shelf vision-language model (VLM) that parses each encounter into the procedure without task-specific training. Across four articulated-object tasks, two in simulation (microwave, door) and two on a real robot (bottle, cabinet), an oracle procedure memory cuts manipulation operations by 16-30% over re-exploration at non-regressing success, and the VLM instantiation recovers 69-88% of that saving out of the box. Because the procedure is a soft bias on a feedback-driven policy, an incorrect memory is recovered from rather than obeyed: success holds even when a retrieved procedure is wrong, as for $\approx$12% of door instances. Across all tasks the benefit is purely one of efficiency: success never regresses, and on the real robot even improves. Code will be released upon acceptance.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23702