AR-WAM: A Visual-Conditioned Agent-Ready World Action Model for Robotic Manipulation
arXiv:2609.23578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI agents become increasingly capable, agent-driven robotic control is emerging as a compelling paradigm. However, prevailing vision-language-action (VLA) models and world action models (WAMs) still rely on natural-language instructions to specify manipulation tasks, an ill-suited interface for agent-driven control: referentially ambiguous, spatially imprecise, redundant with the agent's inherent language understanding, and entangling intent wi
Overview
arXiv:2609.23578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI agents become increasingly capable, agent-driven robotic control is emerging as a compelling paradigm. However, prevailing vision-language-action (VLA) models and world action models (WAMs) still rely on natural-language instructions to specify manipulation tasks, an ill-suited interface for agent-driven control: referentially ambiguous, spatially imprecise, redundant with the agent's inherent language understanding, and entangling intent with execution. We present AR-WAM, a visual-conditioned, agent-ready world action model that replaces language with two complementary conditions: a visual grounding prompt (a bounding box of the target) denoting the interaction object and location, and a learnable operation token dictating the atomic skill to execute. Our compact 0.5B-parameter model, with a frozen pretrained visual encoder and no language encoder, predicts scene evolution within compact latent states while decoding actions, exposing the policy's intent through explicit, supervisable reasoning signals. A model-agnostic compatibility layer provides three primitives (detect, execute, and query) so that local VLMs or online agent APIs can drive the policy directly, with long-horizon memory and closed-loop error recovery delegated to the agent side. On RoboTwin 2.0, RMBench, and a real Astribot S1 dual-arm platform, AR-WAM matches the strongest baselines on standard manipulation (87.2% average success) and outperforms them on memory-dependent and real-robot long-horizon tasks, improving success rates by 5.9% and 36.7%, respectively, while maintaining the lowest inference latency (14.1 ms).
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23578