Real-Time Bounded Catenary Solver for UAV Tether Modeling
arXiv:2609.18482v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For non-stationary tethered multirotor UAVs in real-world conditions, simulating the forces imposed on the drone by the aerodynamic drag of the tether becomes crucial, with online use cases placing a hard bound on the maximum solve time. In previous work, a quasi-analytical catenary tether model reached a mean solve time of 0.51 ms using a general-purpose root finder, but without any worst-case guarantees or proven convergence. In this work, we re
Overview
arXiv:2609.18482v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For non-stationary tethered multirotor UAVs in real-world conditions, simulating the forces imposed on the drone by the aerodynamic drag of the tether becomes crucial, with online use cases placing a hard bound on the maximum solve time. In previous work, a quasi-analytical catenary tether model reached a mean solve time of 0.51 ms using a general-purpose root finder, but without any worst-case guarantees or proven convergence. In this work, we reformulate the inner solver by reducing the catenary boundary-value problem to a single transcendental equation in one well-conditioned unknown. We derive a closed-form bracket and prove monotonicity and convexity as well as existence and uniqueness of the root, which together guarantee convergence of the solver. We further propose a two-regime initial guess which approximates the true root within 3.4% and reduces the mean iteration count by 68.0% to 2.36 compared to the textbook initialization. Building on the hybrid root-finding method rtsafe (Newton-Raphson with bisection fallback giving bounded iteration counts), we implement a specialized variant that exploits the problem structure to omit unnecessary checks while retaining correctness, which gives up to 1.3 times speedup. With the proposed solver the full tether model achieves a nearly constant solve time of 6.9 us on average and 7.7 us at worst, a 40 times speedup over an optimized re-implementation of the previous method, while agreeing with it to a relative deviation of 8.7e-9. Because the reformulation leaves the underlying physical model untouched, the experimental validation of the previous work carries over unchanged. We further demonstrate its suitability for embedded, resource-constrained platforms with a Lua implementation running directly in ArduPilot on a drone's flight controller, where it stays well inside the scheduling budget with a mean solve time of 0.74 ms.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18482