TacPrint: A Wearable Fingertip Tactile Sensor for Human-to-Robot Contact Reproduction
arXiv:2607.29231v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human-centric data collection is emerging as a significant paradigm for robot skill acquisition, but seamlessly integrating low-cost, scalable tactile sensing systems that capture fine-grained fingertip interactions without compromising natural operation remains a key challenge. This reduces the reliability of human-to-robot transfer in contact-rich tasks. In this work, we present TacPrint, a wearable fingertip tactile sensor, where protrusions on
Overview
arXiv:2607.29231v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human-centric data collection is emerging as a significant paradigm for robot skill acquisition, but seamlessly integrating low-cost, scalable tactile sensing systems that capture fine-grained fingertip interactions without compromising natural operation remains a key challenge. This reduces the reliability of human-to-robot transfer in contact-rich tasks. In this work, we present TacPrint, a wearable fingertip tactile sensor, where protrusions on the inner surface of the silicone skin are aligned one-to-one with 24 capacitive taxels to enable localized capacitive responses. A real-to-sim-to-real pipeline estimates a 35 $\times$ 26 contact-depth map from 24-channel capacitive signals. Against simulation-generated labels, the model achieved a contact-region RMSE of 0.223 $\pm$ 0.161 mm, a weighted-centroid error of 1.213 $\pm$ 2.379 pixels, and an IoU of 0.829 $\pm$ 0.169. With measured capacitive inputs, the network-predicted depth evaluated at the guide-calibrated contact center showed a mean absolute error of 0.085 $\pm$ 0.057 mm across all 40 controlled trials, while the mean contact-position error was 0.250 $\pm$ 0.208 mm across the 37 trials whose reference contact regions were not truncated by the sensing boundary. In human-to-robot replay, tactile-guided compensation increased grasping and wiping success rates from 0% to 91.67% and 90%, respectively. In closed-loop grasping, dense-depth feedback achieved success rates of 87.5% over all tested positions and 85% under edge-contact conditions, compared with 67.5% and 45% for raw-taxel feedback.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29231